Hello. Alan Cox wrote:
No reason to go removing ones that are correct
You've just effectively claimed them to be incorrect with your claim what validity bits are not sufficient and ATA revision must be checked. Check the
Nope. Please go re-read what I wrote.
Then I don't understand why you wrote it -- I didn't urge you to fix the correct inlines.
source please -- I wouldn't have dropped the revision check if the rest of the inlines that check word 82/82 were using it.
In other words, as I said, you removed a correct check rather than correcting others which may not be correct.
Yes. But I have no time to fix everything for everybody. MBR, Sergei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
