> > No reason to go removing ones that are correct > > You've just effectively claimed them to be incorrect with your claim what > validity bits are not sufficient and ATA revision must be checked. Check the Nope. Please go re-read what I wrote. > source please -- I wouldn't have dropped the revision check if the rest of the > inlines that check word 82/82 were using it. In other words, as I said, you removed a correct check rather than correcting others which may not be correct. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
