Re: [PATCH] ide/libata: fix ata_id_is_cfa()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > No reason to go removing ones that are correct
> 
>     You've just effectively claimed them to be incorrect with your claim what 
> validity bits are not sufficient and ATA revision must be checked. Check the 

Nope. Please go re-read what I wrote.

> source please -- I wouldn't have dropped the revision check if the rest of the 
> inlines that check word 82/82 were using it.

In other words, as I said, you removed a correct check rather than
correcting others which may not be correct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux