> > The word 82 validity bit is not sufficient as that bit is itself not > > There's no word 82 validity bits, its validity bits are in word 83. Word 83 sorry - I seem to have 82 and 83 bit flipped in my brain, not good for ATA work ;) > > > defined in ATA < 3. Otherwise the change looks correct. > > Well, then we need to fix every case of using *only* the validity bits in > ata.h. No reason to go removing ones that are correct -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
