On Mon, Jan 05 2009, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 19:54, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 05 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> >> +static struct queue_sysfs_entry queue_nonrot_entry = {
> >> + .attr = {.name = "nonrot", .mode = S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR },
> >> + .show = queue_nonrot_show,
> >> + .store = queue_nonrot_store,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >
> > Lets please use a better name for export reasons, non-rotational is a
> > lot better. Nobody will know what nonrot means :-)
>
> What's that negation good for? Can't we just have "rotational", like
> we have "removable" and not "non-removable"? :)
Non-rotational is the term typically used, since rotational is the norm
(still). So I think the negation actually makes sense in this case :-)
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
