starlight@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Thank you for explaining how it works. Have resigned to living > with 1.5G. A reason exists to run the ES.2s at their full > sequential 100 Mbytes/sec (800 Mbits/sec), and I had hoped that > lowering the latency on the link might squeeze a bit more > performance. But 1.5 is good enough. Considering general disk operation speed and the parallel operation achieved using NCQ, I don't think it will make any noticeable difference. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
