There's no reason to schedule LPM action after probing is complete causing another EH iteration. Just schedule it together with probing itself. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 3 +-- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c index ffc689d..a12a27e 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c @@ -5615,7 +5615,7 @@ int ata_host_register(struct ata_host *host, struct scsi_host_template *sht) spin_lock_irqsave(ap->lock, flags); ehi->probe_mask |= ATA_ALL_DEVICES; - ehi->action |= ATA_EH_RESET; + ehi->action |= ATA_EH_RESET | ATA_EH_LPM; ehi->flags |= ATA_EHI_NO_AUTOPSY | ATA_EHI_QUIET; ap->pflags &= ~ATA_PFLAG_INITIALIZING; @@ -5648,7 +5648,6 @@ int ata_host_register(struct ata_host *host, struct scsi_host_template *sht) struct ata_port *ap = host->ports[i]; ata_scsi_scan_host(ap, 1); - ata_lpm_schedule(ap, ap->pm_policy); } return 0; -- 1.5.2.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
