Robert Hancock wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
Tejun Heo írta:
akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor@xxxxxxxxxx>
unchangelogged patch.
Signed-off-by: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zboszor@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Nacked-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
Sorry, there are remaining issues to resolve before enabling ADMA by
default.
Sorry, this is NOT ADMA. SWNCQ is completely independent from ADMA.
Heh, right. Sorry about that. I disabled ADMA on the distro I work
for and somehow ADMA was disabled on mainline too. :-)
Robert, is SWNCQ safe to turn on by default? I personally think it's
better to prefer safety over performance or optional features and
given the history of NCQ support on nv satas, I feel a bit more cautious.
Maybe we can enable SWNCQ on -mm and devel branches and disable it
late in release cycle for 2.6.26 for a trial?
I haven't seen any problem reports, but with it disabled by default most
people haven't tried it. The only way to really know is to try turning
it on by default and see what shakes out.
I'd vote to enable it by default in -mm and 2.6.26-rc and see what happens.
Alright, Zoltan can you please repost w/ commit message fixed and
comment stating /* FIXME: for testing during blah blah */ added?
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
