saeed bishara wrote:
On 1/16/08, Mark Lord <liml@xxxxxx> wrote:
saeed bishara wrote:
I attached the new patch
..
Try again, please.
This time, post the patch *inline* in the body of the email,
so that it can more easily be seen, read, and commented on.
Beware of many email clients that mangle inline patches, though.
Cheers
Here is the same patch inlined:
From c5f5af7f2eed2fe42e28374257b983922dfd3db5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Saeed Bishara <saeed@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 10:43:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sata_mv: Remove PCI dependency
The integrated SATA controller is connected directly to the SoC's
internal bus, not via PCI interface. this patch removes the dependency
on the PCI interface.
Signed-off-by: Saeed Bishara <saeed@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/ata/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/ata/sata_mv.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
2 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
ACK the changes; but both git-am(1) and patch(1) report that this is a
corrupt patch. patch(1) says,
[jgarzik@pretzel libata-dev]$ patch -sp1 < /g/tmp/mbox
patch: **** malformed patch at line 151: *hpriv, int idx,
(patch is generally more forgiving than git-am)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
