Re: [PATCH] Palmchip BK3710 IDE driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:11:37 +0300
Anton Salnikov <asalnikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > +static inline u32 ioread(u32 reg)
> > > +{
> > > +	return ioread32(base + reg);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static inline void iowrite(u32 val, u32 reg)
> > > +{
> > > +	iowrite32(val, base + reg);
> > > +}
> > 
> > Why not just use ioread32/iowrite32 directly ?
> 
> Because this increases readability and does not affect functionality at all

There I would disagree. It means that if you ever have a system with two
of these controllers in future it will break as base is a static for the
entire driver.

Easy enough to fix with a simple
	
	static inline u32 hwif_ioread32(hwif, u32 reg) { ...
hwif->dma_base ...}

version ?

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux