Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Just a data point, even ICHs lock up after PHY event if the wrong TF
> register is accessed.  I just don't think tempting with TF regs after
> timeout is worth the cost.

For SATA maybe, for PATA I don't have any controllers with your bug so
its wrong for libata to cripple the PATA support or working controllers.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux