Re: ATA device reset, shoud I be concerned?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > [ 9031.028000] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 
> > frozen
> > [ 9031.028000] ata1.00: cmd c8/00:08:90:ca:ce/00:00:00:00:00/e0 tag 0 cdb 0x0 
> > data 4096 in
> > [ 9031.028000]          res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 
> > (timeout)

We got bored of waiting for the drive to respond to our request. I still
think we have the timeouts too short or are accounting queue time
somewhere we shouldn't as there a few other examples where we don't allow
long enough for a drive to retry out and fail with a media error on a bad
sector.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux