On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:43:50PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > >>>Remaining question: any preferred name for that property? pio-mode okay? > >>>It's assuming that PIO6 capable bus supports PIO0 as well, thus no mask. > > >> I've already suggested "generic". A name "simple" also comes to my mind. > > >You've misread my question. I didn't ask about driver name, but pio-mode > >property. > > Probably "max-pio-mode" is a better variant. Why? pio-mode in pata-platform context is just something highly dependent on hardware, can not be touched. And we're passing pio-mode information from the hardware dependent source -- device tree. The only difference between pata-platform's max-pio-mode and dedicated ata driver's pio-mode is that that for the first case bus already configured for specified mode, and for the second case dedicated driver should actually use this information to configure hardware. No need for max- prefix, I think. -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbou@xxxxxxx backup email: ya-cbou@xxxxxxxxx irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
