Re: [PATCH 14/14] libata: use PIO for misc ATAPI commands

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
>>> Private command type / transfer length filtering in sata_promise,
>>> pata_it821x and pata_pdc2027x are removed as core layer filtering is
>>> more conservative.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
>> NAK - as before
>>
>> This is the wrong way to do stuff. Stop penalizing the 99.99% of users
>> with perfectly sane hardware. In addition I note that the whitelist for
>> drives would rapidly be thousands of entries long and unmanagable.
> 
> Well, I guess we'll have to agree to disagree here.  I just don't think
> that penalty is worth considering and definitely don't think whitelist
> is necessary at all.

Also, what do other people think about the subject?  IIRC, Jeff agrees
with Alan, right?  Albert, Mark, what do you guys think?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux