On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 04:36:01PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Tejun Heo wrote: > >> Backport ATA_FLAG_NO_SRST and ATA_FLAG_ASSUME_ATA. These are > >> originally link flags (ATA_LFLAG_*) but link abstraction doesn't exist > >> on 2.6.23, so make it port flags. > >> > >> This is for the following workaround for ASUS P5W DH Deluxe. > >> > >> These new flags don't introduce any behavior change unless set and > >> nobody sets them yet. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> This and the next patch are a bit large for -stable but they don't > >> change anything for machines other than P5W DH and P5W DH users have > >> been suffering long enough, so I think it'll be nice to include these > >> patches in the next -stable release. However, feel free to NACK if > >> you can see some danger in these patches. > >> > >> Jeff, what do you think? > >> > >> drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > >> include/linux/libata.h | 2 ++ > >> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > ACK from me, though I wonder if we shouldn't wait and get feedback once > > this hits upstream (my next push to Andrew and Linus), before applying > > to stable. No special reason, just being conservative... > > Agreed. Let's give the upstream changes a few weeks before updating > -stable. I'll ping this thread after a few weeks. Ok, thanks, I'll hold off until you respond. greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
