Re: [PATCH 1/2] libata: backport ATA_FLAG_NO_SRST and ATA_FLAG_ASSUME_ATA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Garzik wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Backport ATA_FLAG_NO_SRST and ATA_FLAG_ASSUME_ATA.  These are
originally link flags (ATA_LFLAG_*) but link abstraction doesn't exist
on 2.6.23, so make it port flags.

This is for the following workaround for ASUS P5W DH Deluxe.

These new flags don't introduce any behavior change unless set and
nobody sets them yet.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx>
---
This and the next patch are a bit large for -stable but they don't
change anything for machines other than P5W DH and P5W DH users have
been suffering long enough, so I think it'll be nice to include these
patches in the next -stable release.  However, feel free to NACK if
you can see some danger in these patches.

Jeff, what do you think?

 drivers/ata/libata-eh.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 include/linux/libata.h  |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

ACK from me, though I wonder if we shouldn't wait and get feedback once this hits upstream (my next push to Andrew and Linus), before applying to stable. No special reason, just being conservative...

Agreed. Let's give the upstream changes a few weeks before updating -stable. I'll ping this thread after a few weeks.

Thanks.

--
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux