Re: Sata Sil3512 bug?; Promise SATA300 TX4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



MisterE wrote:
> But after some heavy reading/writing with the promise i got 2 errors. (see log file).

Log file got lost. Please post relevant parts inline.


Alexander Sabourenkov can you please tell me where i can find the
"Bug is fixed in 2.6.23.1: sata_promise: port is slow to respond,
reset failed" thread you mentioned?

That would be this one:
(got split into two parts)
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg14069.html
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg15299.html



So basically the question is this. Can i trust the SATA300 TX4 or
should i buy a Highpoint RocketRAID 1640/1740?. I can order such device
online but i need to be sure that it works correctly :(


Since you have the hardware, do the tests and decide for yourself.

I'd try copying one (big, preferably over 160G ) disk onto another (with dd) for a start,
while waiting for answers on mailing lists.


--

./lxnt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux