On Wed, 08 Aug 2007 11:21:08 +0900 Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > >>> I'd rather know what is going on here. A drive can legitimately > >>> support LBA48 and HPA and refuse READ_NATIVE_MAX_EXT. > >> READ_NATIVE_MAX_EXT is mandatory if HPA && LBA48, no > > > > Ok the report in that thread is different. The offending Maxtor simply > > aborts the read_native_max_ext > > I'll resend sans ata_id_has_hpa() change. Does that sound okay? I > don't really think we can do anything other than blacklisting it. Other than finding someone who can test it with a different controller (especially SI3112 and old-ide) I agree - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
