Re: [PATCH] libata: implement BROKEN_HPA horkage and apply it to HDS724040KLSA80

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Alan Cox wrote:
>>> I'd rather know what is going on here. A drive can legitimately
>>> support LBA48 and HPA and refuse READ_NATIVE_MAX_EXT.
>> READ_NATIVE_MAX_EXT is mandatory if HPA && LBA48, no
> 
> Ok the report in that thread is different. The offending Maxtor simply
> aborts the read_native_max_ext

I'll resend sans ata_id_has_hpa() change.  Does that sound okay?  I
don't really think we can do anything other than blacklisting it.

-- 
tejun
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux