Re: libata fails to recover from HSM violation involving DRQ status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Lord wrote:
> .. And here is another test of un-hacked 2.6.21,
> this time for ata_piix with a pure PATA configuration.
> Again, it passes with flying colours.

Thanks a lot.  I'd also like to try but I'm on the road and not bored
enough (yet) to do that on my only working machine.  It's good to know
that SRST is a strong enough kick in the pants for actual ATA devices.
So, we only have to fix that stubborn ata_piix.  :-)

-- 
tejun

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux