On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 08:45:04PM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote: > > [adding netdev] > > [meta-comment: I wish people wouldn't use such unnecessarily broad subjects > > -- how is it the x86-64 port's or AMD's fault when you have broken hardware? > > Would anybody write "Silent corruption on i386" or "Silent corruption > > on Intel" or "Silent corruption on Linux"?] > > I hope you feel better now that I changed the subject. > > Aaron, I see no clear suspect between 2.6.20.1 and current -git > that could explain nor fix a corruption in the r8169 driver. > > Can you apply on top of latest 2.6.21-rc5-git the patches available at > http://www.fr.zoreil.com/linux/kernel/2.6.x/2.6.21-rc5/r8169-20070402 > > 000[12]-r8169-foo-bar.patch have been committed a few minutes ago: you > should check if they apply or not. I'll try to get to testing this, but I'm wondering if people may have misunderstood my original post. I don't get any corruption over Ethernet; it's just corruption on the filesystem during certain load patterns that involve the Realtek ethernet card. Aaron - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
