Re: HPA patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 01:08:52AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> ata3.01: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 234441648, hpa_sectors = 0
                                                                ^
Does this just indicate the lack of an hpa? If so, the

/* if no hpa, both should be equal */

comment seems to be wrong (or, alternatively, it's the 
ata_read_native_max_address_ext call that's failing and returning 
garbage? I'll look into that)

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux