Re: Why is NCQ enabled by default by libata? (2.6.20)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Justin Piszcz wrote:
Without NCQ, performance is MUCH better on almost every operation, with the exception of 2-3 items.

Variables to take into account:

* the drive (NCQ performance wildly varies)
* the IO scheduler
* the filesystem (if not measuring direct to blkdev)
* application workload (or in your case, benchmark tool)
	* in particular, the threaded-ness of the apps

For the overwhelming majority of combinations, NCQ should not /hurt/ performance.

For the majority of combinations, NCQ helps (though it may not be often that you use more than 4-8 tags).

In some cases, NCQ firmware may be broken. There is a Maxtor firmware id, and some Hitachi ids that people are leaning towards recommending be added to the libata 'horkage' list.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux