Re: sata_inic162x driver for 2.6.19 timeouts etc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo wrote:
Bob Stewart wrote:
I wonder if this card of mine is what's bad.  I loaded Sarge 2.4 and the
Sunix driver and a new disk onto my test whore. I got essentially the same sort of errors as with your driver (see below) but in this case,
abolutely nothing was ever reliable, including the partition table.  I'm
not sure I want to buy another card to test this out, though. Maybe I'll put the card in my other machine just to verify it's not a mobo issue, though. crapcrapcrap!

Sample errors:

drive not ready for command
status timeout: status = 0x80 { busy }

error = 0x00 { }
dma_intr: status = 0x51 {drive ready SeekComplete error}

My bet is on broken driver. sunix driver doesn't seem like it was written carefully. Anyways, thanks for testing. It seems we'll either have to implement adma mode. I'll mark the driver broken for 2.6.21.


Broken, or LBA28-only?

I would think that we have other controllers that need an LBA28-only flag. (note: don't be fooled by ATA_FLAG_PIO_LBA48, that doesn't quite do what we want)

Alan, Mark, surely some ancient controller simply can't do LBA48 at all, even in PIO mode?

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux