Re: [ibm-acpi-devel] CONFIG_IBM_BAY

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/19/07, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Shem Multinymous wrote:
> Userspace wants to (non-force-)-unmount by itself after (1), so it can
> stop  the eject process if the filesystems cannot be cleanly
> unmounted. So the force-unmount at (3) ends up being a redundant
> safety measure at best.

More like it is a "make sure we can actually eject, as we have been told
to".  We might return an error instead, but if we do, we need a way to
force-eject (e.g. echo 2 >eject).

Which stage are you referring to?

Note that the only way to check if you can unmount is to actually do
so. Otherwise, you're very likely to run into race conditions with
someone accessing the filesystem between  the check and the actual
unmount.

 Shem
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux