Alan Cox wrote: > On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 22:00:50 +0900 > Komuro <komurojun-mbn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The pata_pcmcia driver reports the cmd port is 0x00010100, >> but actually the cmd port is 0x0100. >> >> Is this corect? > > When the pci_iomap patches were applied the ports reported for every > device went strange. It appears to display the wrong information > nowdays. I see the same but I've got many more important things to work > on before I even bother to look at it. > > My guess is someone is now printing the iomap virtual addresses not the > bus ones. Yes, we're printing the ioaddr.* directly and those are all iomapped addressed now. I wonder whether we should fix this or push the port printing to LLDs (with sff helpers in libata-sff). ahci and pata_generic sharing one format doesn't sound like a too good idea. I'll fix it after new init model. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
