Sergey Vlasov wrote:
>
> However, that value is important - together with the kernel messages
> printed during detection of drivers. Most likely the sector number is
> out of range for your disk, and the disk replies to such access with
> the SectorIdNotFound error.
Unfortunately it means I will have to crash my system once more :) I will
do that this weekend, after unmounting everything.
>
> Just provide the full dmesg output if you are unsure which lines are
> relevant for the problem.
Relevant dmesg output:
...
Probing IDE interface ide3...
hdg: Maxtor 4G120J6, ATA DISK drive
...
hdg: max request size: 512KiB
hdg: 240121728 sectors (122942 MB) w/2048KiB Cache, CHS=16383/255/63,
UDMA(100)
hdg: cache flushes not supported
hdg: hdg1 hdg2
>
> Please provide also the "fdisk -l -u /dev/hdg" output.
cartman:/home/guido# fdisk -l -u /dev/hdg
Disk /dev/hdg: 122.9 GB, 122942324736 bytes
16 heads, 63 sectors/track, 238216 cylinders, total 240121728 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hdg1 * 63 120060863 60030400+ 83 Linux
/dev/hdg2 120060896 240121759 60030432 83 Linux
>
> Is the partition table correct? Maybe the partition extends beyond
> the end of physical disk for some reason, and when the kernel tries to
> access last blocks of the partition, it actually tries to read sectors
> beyond the actual drive capacity, which fails and exposes broken error
> handling in the Promise IDE driver.
I don't know how to verify that the partition table is correct, hopefully
you can extract this from the supplied data. (If partition table is not
correct, would I be able to update that dynamically, or must I move all
data to different disks, reset the partition table and copy data back?)
>
> I have added the linux-ide mailing list to Cc: - problems related to
> IDE/ATA drivers (both old IDE, which you are using currently, and
> newer libata) should be discussed there.
>
>> I started looking more into the problem and found out that the vol_id
>> program would only crash IF it was looking for raid. If I rain the
>> vol_id
>> program with the option --skip-raid, everything worked flawless.
>
> With --skip-raid vol_id does not look for Linux software RAID
> superblocks, which are located at the end of device.
Ok, now that part is clear to me also :)
Hope you have enough of info with this, if not, I can crash my system this
weekend again and supply you with more relevant data :)
Regards,
Guido Diepen
--
Aviation is proof that given the will, we have the capacity to achieve
the impossible.
--Eddie Rickenbacker
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
