Re: [PATCH libata-dev#upstream-fixes] pata_amd: fix an obvious bug in cable detection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 02:41:22 +0900
Tejun Heo <htejun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > Why can't libata do the right thing and just send IDENTIFY command
> > to the slave device first?
> 
> That's my plan B.  I'm just not sure whether it would do any good, would it?

Should find out soon. I've updated my tree to add the ->cable_detect()
method, along with finishing off the (ap, adev) cleanup by passing only
adev to set_pio_mode and friends, also killing the un-needed
->post_set_mode() now that set_mode can be wrapped.

Having a separate ->cable_detect() method cleans stuff up a ton btw. Will
post my tree soon for discussion.

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux