On 2/15/07, Albert Lee <albertcc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some Maxtor drives have "Maxtor" and others have "MAXTOR" in the identify device data. If the slave is a "MAXTOR" one, the following code segment doesn't work.
The 6L drive is a design brought over from Maxtor's purchase of Quantum, the 6Y is a Maxtor local design.
Maybe we should check both "Maxtor" and "MAXTOR"?
It will have to... or maybe not... Since I think Maxtor was the only vendor doing ATA133, maybe just limit slave port on those adapters to UDMA100? (Just checked newegg, and Hitachi lists theirs as ATA133, while Samsung list theirs as ATA133 compatible (default ATA100)) Were there enough other vendors doing ATA133 at the time the technote was written to know if other brands were also affected? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
