On Friday 09 February 2007 23:29, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > The driver wrongly takes the address setup time into account when calculating > the PIO recovery time -- this leads to slight overclocking of the PIO modes 0 > and 1 (so, the prayers failed to help, as usual :-). Rework the code to be > calculating recovery clock count as a difference between the total cycle count > and the active count (we don't need to calculate the recovery time itself since > it's not specified for the PIO modes 0 to 2, and for modes 3 and 4 this formula > gives enough recovery time anyway in the chip's supported PCI frequency range). > > This patch has been inspired by reading the datasheets and looking at what the > libata driver does; it has been compile-tested only (as usual :-) but anyway, > the new code gives the same or longer recovery times than the old one... > > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> applied - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
