Re: [PATCH] libata: add support for ATA_16 commands to ATAPI devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I do not wish to completely eliminate the current behavior, which passes 
> through all opcodes to the ATAPI device.  You cannot guarantee that 
> ATA_16 is never used for a vendor-reserved opcode, for example.

For 16 byte commands via SG_IO you know the command is 16 bytes long as
the command length is passed in hdr->cmd_len which becomes rq->cmd_len.
Is that not sufficient to avoid this ATA_16 test if you pass it on to the
required functions ?

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux