On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 21:53 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > > >>> When Linus remaps IRQ0 on x86, I'll follow that code as a testament. Until > > >>>this happens, I consider is just an opinion. Forcing every arch but x86 to > > >>>remap IRQ0 is an example of the double standards. > > Can I have a link to that specific answer from Linus, please? Somehow I > missed it. That debate is pointless. arch/powerpc now always remaps and 0 is always illegal as a logical IRQ number, while it's perfectly legal as a HW number on any PIC, so there is no more problem. Other archs might probably want to do a similar remapping anyway as it makes loads of things easier when you have multiple PICs and/or dynamically assigned numbers. Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
