Re: [PATCH] libata: waits up to 10 microseconds for early irq problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Lord wrote:
It's only worthwhile if the poll was actually necessary.
My question is, do we really want this overhead in the hot path
on every single ATA interrupt, or should we instead simply blacklist
those devices with the problem?


Nod...  that's my thinking as well

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux