Hi, I have tested the patch with separate port_info and a patch only adding the flag ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS for all controllers. The result is allways the same. The second sata disk is allways /dev/sdb. libata handles this correctly. So i am not sure, that the separate port_info is really necessary. My assumption is a ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS is sufficient for a correct handling. If i am wrong, i will send a patch with separate port_info . regards, Uwe Tejun Heo wrote: > Hi! > > Uwe Koziolek wrote: >> Hi Jim, >> >> the sata_sis is running without slave support in the versions from >> kernel.org. That is ok if you are using >> a SiS964 and 965L chip. The SiS 965, SiS180 and SiS966 needs a slave >> support. >> >> The attached patch against 2.6.18 should help. >> >> feedback, log and output of lspci -vvxxx are welcome. > > Can you make separate port_info for controllers which support 4 ports > and send a properly formatted patch? > > Thanks. > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
