RE: sil24 vs. noapic: what does this mean?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-ide-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:linux-ide-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Eyal Lebedinsky
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 5:31 AM
> To: list linux-ide
> Subject: sil24 vs. noapic: what does this mean?
> 
> At the office we are testing a new mobo and initially used 
> the onboard SATA controllers (an sata_nv and sil24).
> 
> Disks are Seagate Barracuda ES 750GB on Asus P5N-SLI-SE-DELUXE mobo.
> 
> We get regular failures on the sil24 attached disks. Changing 
> power supply had no effect. We then booted with 'noapic' and 
> not a single error today.
> 
> The errors are of this type (sorry, no logs were kept)
> 	status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }

Which of course is a "no error" status. The LSbit indicates an error
which is not set here. Is it possible interrupts are not working
correctly?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux