sil24 vs. noapic: what does this mean?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At the office we are testing a new mobo and initially used the onboard
SATA controllers (an sata_nv and sil24).

Disks are Seagate Barracuda ES 750GB on Asus P5N-SLI-SE-DELUXE mobo.

We get regular failures on the sil24 attached disks. Changing power supply
had no effect. We then booted with 'noapic' and not a single error today.

The errors are of this type (sorry, no logs were kept)
	status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }

They arrive often and do not seem to relate so specific disk activity. In
this case it was a raid syncing for a few hours (naturally it never completed).

What does this indicate: A mobo problem? A bios issue? A bios setup error?
A kernel apic issue or a sil24 driver issue?

I used to get these at home when I used a sil based card (now not in use
anymore) and I consider this a common problem. I also see these mentioned
often elsewhere (as a websearch can easily confirm).

-- 
Eyal Lebedinsky (eyal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) <http://samba.org/eyal/>
	attach .zip as .dat
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux