Alan Cox wrote:
Ar Iau, 2006-08-10 am 03:27 -0400, ysgrifennodd Jeff Garzik:
hehe :)
Well I am more than willing to rename it, though its a bit low priority.
What would people prefer? libata-sff.c ?
Looking at the non-PCI cases I think it needs a three way split
- Libata core as it is now basically (no bus specific code at all)
- Libata register compatibility stuff (ST506) in a file (no
dependancies) [libata-legacy] ??
As we're using 'legacy' to refer to PCI compatible mode and it's a bit
long, how about libata-tf?
- Libata BMDMA, SFF PCI in a file (dep CONFIG_PCI) [libata-sff]
--
tejun
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
