On Friday 02 June 2006 21:42, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
>
> On May 28, 2006, at 19:49, Mark Lord wrote:
>
> > The attached patch [0.7-backport] is an untested backport of the
> > latest sata_mv,
> > which should be more reliable than what you've been using. [0.5]
>
> It works most of the time (where the 0.5 didn't work most of the
> time), but I still see the "Badness in __msleep" occasionally (and it
> only detects one of the disks then). However, the Adaptec BIOS is
> only seeing one of the disks sometimes, so maybe there's something
> wrong with the hardware. The BIOS did detect both drives in the boot
> that gave the output below though.
Weird. I cannot make sense of that traceback. What CPU is this kernel built for?
And does this patch (below) make the "Badness" go away?
Cheers
---
--- linux/drivers/scsi/sata_mv.c.16-backport 2006-05-26 09:15:22.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/drivers/scsi/sata_mv.c 2006-06-02 22:39:07.000000000 -0400
@@ -2022,7 +2022,7 @@
static void mv_phy_reset(struct ata_port *ap)
{
- __mv_phy_reset(ap, 1);
+ __mv_phy_reset(ap, 0);
}
/**
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
