Jens Axboe wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02 2006, zhao, forrest wrote: >> On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 08:03 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 01 2006, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >>>> Jens Axboe wrote: >>>>> It's a lot more complicated than that, I'm afraid. ahci doesn't even >>>>> have the resume/suspend methods defined, plus it needs more work than >>>>> piix on resume. >>>>> >>>> Hannes Reinecke's patch implements those functions, basically by >>>> factoring out the shutdown and init code and calling them at >>>> suspend/resume time as well. >>>> >>>> Is that correct/sufficient? Or should something else be happening? >>> No that's it, I know for a fact that suspend/resume works perfectly with >>> the 10.1 suse kernel. You can give that a shot, if you want. >> You may mean the Hannes's patch for 10.1 SUSE kernel. Hannes's patch >> posted in open source community(or in linux-ide mailing list) didn't >> work. > > I didn't say Hannes patch, I said I know that 10.1 works. And that is > probably in large due to the patch that Hannes did, which implents > resume/suspend and takes care of reinitializing the resources. > Indeed. I didn't post the latest set of patches to the open-source community as Jeff indicated he would only accept patches against libata-dev. And as I didn't have time to port them yet I didn't feel the need to do so. Forrest, please drop me a mail if I can be of further assistance. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke hare@xxxxxxx SuSE Linux Products GmbH S390 & zSeries Maxfeldstraße 5 +49 911 74053 688 90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html