zhao, forrest wrote: > On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 13:19 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >> Jens Axboe wrote: >>> It's a lot more complicated than that, I'm afraid. ahci doesn't even >>> have the resume/suspend methods defined, plus it needs more work than >>> piix on resume. >>> >> Hannes Reinecke's patch implements those functions, basically by >> factoring out the shutdown and init code and calling them at >> suspend/resume time as well. >> >> Is that correct/sufficient? Or should something else be happening? > > According to our test of Hannes's patch, it's not sufficient to support > AHCI suspend/resume. > > Now I'm writing a patch to try to provide complete support for AHCI > suspend/resume and will send out patch soon, hopefully by the end of > today. > Can I have details, please? What doesn't work? Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke hare@xxxxxxx SuSE Linux Products GmbH S390 & zSeries Maxfeldstraße 5 +49 911 74053 688 90409 Nürnberg http://www.suse.de - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
