Re: [RFT] major libata update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo wrote:
* Those spurious FISes are actively setting the I bit requesting interrupt explicitly. Those are not innocent status update FISes. And

FWIW, most firmwares probably derive the value of 'I' directly from the nIEN bit. In our situation, it would be unusual for 'I' to be cleared. 'I' is really irrelevant for advanced, FIS-based controllers in any case.

	Jeff


-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux