On Llu, 2006-05-15 at 17:44 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > That's what gcc thinks. The code is 100% correct -- it will never reach > the switch statement with mode > 0 (in which case ultra_mask isn't used) and > ultra_mask unitialized. I may add an explicit initializer in the declaration > if you like... Please leave the warning, this was discussed recently in other threads and hiding warnings is very dangerous. - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html