On Sul, 2006-03-26 at 08:57 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > Can you elaborate how ata_dev_pair() is broken by this patch? > ata_dev_present() is simply renamed to ata_dev_enabled(). > ata_dev_disabled() only differenciates the conditions where > ata_dev_present() used to think there was no device. There should be > no behavior change to existing code. Some of the drivers want one sematic some want the other, and ata_dev_pair is now confusing. Needs a pair of better names and I'm not sure what they should be - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
