Re: [PATCH v2 19/24] xtensa/cpu: Make sure cpu_die() doesn't return
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 19/24] xtensa/cpu: Make sure cpu_die() doesn't return
- From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 11:48:41 -0800
- Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgross@xxxxxxxx, richard.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx, ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mattst88@xxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx, guoren@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-csky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx, kernel@xxxxxxxxxx, loongarch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx, tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jiaxun.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx, mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, npiggin@xxxxxxxxx, christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dalias@xxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, chris@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx, vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx, dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, bsegall@xxxxxxxxxx, mgorman@xxxxxxx, bristot@xxxxxxxxxx, vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <20230214182322.r5tyeowxzloiuh72@treble>
- References: <cover.1676358308.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org> <cca346b5c87693499e630291d78fb0bf12c24290.1676358308.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org> <1b4afd82-83cb-0060-7cab-8e16d2e69ff9@linaro.org> <20230214182322.r5tyeowxzloiuh72@treble>
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 10:23 AM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 08:55:32AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Can you update the documentation along? Currently we have:
> >
> > /*
> > * Called from the idle thread for the CPU which has been shutdown.
> > *
> > * Note that we disable IRQs here, but do not re-enable them
> > * before returning to the caller. This is also the behaviour
> > * of the other hotplug-cpu capable cores, so presumably coming
> > * out of idle fixes this.
> > */
>
> void __ref cpu_die(void)
> {
> idle_task_exit();
> local_irq_disable();
> __asm__ __volatile__(
> " movi a2, cpu_restart\n"
> " jx a2\n");
>
> BUG();
> }
>
> Hm, not only is the comment wrong, but it seems to be branching to
> cpu_restart? That doesn't seem right at all.
Perhaps the name is a bit misleading. The CPU that enters 'cpu_restart'
loops there until a call to 'boot_secondary' releases it, after which it goes
to '_startup'. So it is a restart, but not immediate.
--
Thanks.
-- Max
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]