Re: [PATCH v2 19/24] xtensa/cpu: Make sure cpu_die() doesn't return
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 19/24] xtensa/cpu: Make sure cpu_die() doesn't return
- From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 12:19:09 -0800
- Cc: juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx, dalias@xxxxxxxx, linux-ia64@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx, dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, jiaxun.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bsegall@xxxxxxxxxx, guoren@xxxxxxxxxx, hpa@xxxxxxxxx, sparclinux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kernel@xxxxxxxxxx, will@xxxxxxxxxx, vschneid@xxxxxxxxxx, f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx, vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx, ysato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, chenhuacai@xxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-csky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxxxxx, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx, mgorman@xxxxxxx, mattst88@xxxxxxxxx, linux-xtensa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx, richard.henderson@xxxxxxxxxx, npiggin@xxxxxxxxx, ink@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx, loongarch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx, linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jgross@xxxxxxxx, chris@xxxxxxxxxx, tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@xxxxxxxxxx>, bristot@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-alpha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, bp@xxxxxxxxx, linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <CAMo8BfLzV0Oe_i-QrMzE-BE028s6GNvOd827N5+tteELidjpvA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <cover.1676358308.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org> <cca346b5c87693499e630291d78fb0bf12c24290.1676358308.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org> <1b4afd82-83cb-0060-7cab-8e16d2e69ff9@linaro.org> <20230214182322.r5tyeowxzloiuh72@treble> <CAMo8BfLzV0Oe_i-QrMzE-BE028s6GNvOd827N5+tteELidjpvA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 11:48:41AM -0800, Max Filippov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 10:23 AM Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 08:55:32AM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > > Can you update the documentation along? Currently we have:
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * Called from the idle thread for the CPU which has been shutdown.
> > > *
> > > * Note that we disable IRQs here, but do not re-enable them
> > > * before returning to the caller. This is also the behaviour
> > > * of the other hotplug-cpu capable cores, so presumably coming
> > > * out of idle fixes this.
> > > */
> >
> > void __ref cpu_die(void)
> > {
> > idle_task_exit();
> > local_irq_disable();
> > __asm__ __volatile__(
> > " movi a2, cpu_restart\n"
> > " jx a2\n");
> >
> > BUG();
> > }
> >
> > Hm, not only is the comment wrong, but it seems to be branching to
> > cpu_restart? That doesn't seem right at all.
>
> Perhaps the name is a bit misleading. The CPU that enters 'cpu_restart'
> loops there until a call to 'boot_secondary' releases it, after which it goes
> to '_startup'. So it is a restart, but not immediate.
Ah, I see. That sounds similar to what Xen does.
--
Josh
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel]
[Sparc Linux]
[DCCP]
[Linux ARM]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCSI]
[Linux x86_64]
[Linux for Ham Radio]