On Sat, 27 Apr 2019, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/sb1250-duart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/sb1250-duart.c
> index 329aced..655961c 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/sb1250-duart.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/sb1250-duart.c
> @@ -663,7 +663,6 @@ static void sbd_release_port(struct uart_port *uport)
>
> static int sbd_map_port(struct uart_port *uport)
> {
> - const char *err = KERN_ERR "sbd: Cannot map MMIO\n";
> struct sbd_port *sport = to_sport(uport);
> struct sbd_duart *duart = sport->duart;
>
> @@ -671,7 +670,7 @@ static int sbd_map_port(struct uart_port *uport)
> uport->membase = ioremap_nocache(uport->mapbase,
> DUART_CHANREG_SPACING);
> if (!uport->membase) {
> - printk(err);
> + dev_err(uport->dev, "Cannot map MMIO (base)\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> @@ -679,7 +678,7 @@ static int sbd_map_port(struct uart_port *uport)
> sport->memctrl = ioremap_nocache(duart->mapctrl,
> DUART_CHANREG_SPACING);
> if (!sport->memctrl) {
> - printk(err);
> + dev_err(uport->dev, "Cannot map MMIO (ctrl)\n");
> iounmap(uport->membase);
> uport->membase = NULL;
> return -ENOMEM;
Hmm, what's the point to have separate messages, which consume extra
memory, for a hardly if at all possible error condition?
Maciej
|