On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:56:07AM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote: > > I don't think I understand your argument. Are you essentially saying we > > should consider eliminating the mach_vec stuff entirely? If so, will > > we essentially be saying that the distros need to build a seperate kernel > > for each of tiger, zx1, sn2, and uv? > > No ... exactly the opposite ... I'm wondering whether we should give > up maintaining/building all the tiger_, zx1_ configs and only have the > generic one ... since it appears that the number of end users of non-generic > kernels can be counted on the toes of one foot. I won't speak to the others, but as for sn2_defconfig SGI appears to still be a go. I did get feedback from a couple engineers that had been using the sn2_defconfig, but both seem to accept the generic_defconfig as an adequate substitue now that it has our needed disk drivers. Thanks, Robin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|