> I don't think I understand your argument. Are you essentially saying we > should consider eliminating the mach_vec stuff entirely? If so, will > we essentially be saying that the distros need to build a seperate kernel > for each of tiger, zx1, sn2, and uv? No ... exactly the opposite ... I'm wondering whether we should give up maintaining/building all the tiger_, zx1_ configs and only have the generic one ... since it appears that the number of end users of non-generic kernels can be counted on the toes of one foot. -Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |