Luck, Tony wrote:
This seems crazy to me. Flushing should occur according to the *architecture*, not model-by-model. Even if we happen to get "lucky" on pre-Montecito CPUs, that doesn't justify such ugly hacks. Or you really want to debug this *again* come next CPU?Ditto. The only reason we should ever have model specific checks should be to work around model specific errata (e.g. the McKinley Errata #9 code in patch.c).
You do have model specific I cache semantics. Not taking it into account will oblige you to flush in vain for the models which do not require it. Why do you want to take this option? Thanks, Zoltan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
|