> This seems crazy to me. Flushing should occur according to the > *architecture*, not model-by-model. Even if we happen to get "lucky" > on pre-Montecito CPUs, that doesn't justify such ugly hacks. Or you > really want to debug this *again* come next CPU? Ditto. The only reason we should ever have model specific checks should be to work around model specific errata (e.g. the McKinley Errata #9 code in patch.c). -Tony - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
![]() |