Hi Andy, Thank you for the review. On Sat, Dec 28, 2024 at 11:37 PM Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 11:51:53AM +0000, Prabhakar kirjoitti: > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Replace the hardcoded `1000000000` with the predefined `NANO` macro for > > clarity. Simplify the code by introducing a `ns_per_tick` variable to > > store `NANO / rate`, reducing redundancy and improving readability. > > ... > > > - brl -= t->scl_fall_ns / (1000000000 / rate); > > - brh -= t->scl_rise_ns / (1000000000 / rate); > > + ns_per_tick = NANO / rate; > > So, why NANO and not NSEC_PER_SEC? > Agreed, I'll switch to NSEC_PER_SEC. Cheers, Prabhakar